Shark Tank Club
This is Shark Tank Community.
Organizers:
- Organized by
-
-
Is it fair for a wealthy person to pitch Shark Tank just for Famous?
-
Is it fair for a wealthy person to pitch Shark Tank just for Famous?
Is it fair for someone from a wealthy background to pitch on Shark Tank mainly for the exposure?
I’ve been thinking about the concept of wealthy individuals seeking investment on Shark Tank primarily for exposure rather than financial need. It raises some interesting questions about fairness and the purpose of the show. On one hand, Shark Tank provides a platform for entrepreneurs to gain publicity, which can be invaluable for any business. On the other hand, it might feel like an advantage when someone with significant resources uses the platform, possibly taking a spot from someone who could really use the investment to grow their business.
What do you think? Is it fair for someone from a wealthy background to pitch on Shark Tank mainly for the exposure?
-
16 Replies
-
I understand the concern, but exposure can be crucial for any business, regardless of the owner’s background. Even wealthy entrepreneurs might benefit from the guidance and networking opportunities that the Sharks provide.
-
While exposure is valuable, the Sharks’ guidance and capital are crucial for those with limited resources.
-
Oh, sure! Because billionaires definitely need a helping hand from TV shows.
-
Next, we’ll see them in charity soup lines, right?
-
-
Short and simple: If they’ve got the money, they shouldn’t take a spot from someone who needs it more. It’s not fair.
-
The show should focus on leveling the playing field, not just offering free advertising to those who can already afford it.
-
Let’s make sure the billionaires don’t hog all the spotlight. They might break a sweat trying to make another million! 😆
-
-
The platform’s primary goal is to help businesses grow, but it’s also a TV show aiming for ratings. Wealthy individuals might bring in viewers, but they should focus on those who truly need the financial support and expertise to succeed.
-
Yes, The exposure should be a bonus, not the main reason for being on the show. It’s about supporting genuine need.
-
Right, because nothing screams “supporting genuine need” like giving millionaires more screen time! 🙄
-
-
I didn’t think about this before! It seems unfair that someone with a lot of resources would take up space on the show
-
They should find other ways to get exposure if they already have the resources.
-
Maybe next, they’ll start a GoFundMe for their yacht repairs. Who knows? 😂
-
-
So, rich folks are just there for a free ad? Seems like they’re just saying, “Hey, look at me! I’m already rich, but I want more airtime!” 😂 Not cool!
-
@sharktankai any thoughts
-
Hmm, that’s an interesting topic! I can see the dilemma here. On one side, Shark Tank is indeed a great platform to showcase a business idea and get that invaluable exposure, whether the person is wealthy or not. After all, every business can benefit from publicity.
But on the flip side, if someone with a lot of resources is using Shark Tank primarily for the exposure, it does feel a tad bit unfair for those who are genuinely in need of investment to bring their dreams to life. It’s like using a shortcut that others might not have access to.
It’s a tough call! What do you think, though? Do you lean more towards one side of the argument?
Really boils down to the intent of the show and the values it promotes, I guess.
-
Log in to reply.